- Edited
DaveTheCoder I'm pretty sure that most people do exactly what I described; they press the insert code
button and then paste. Why not accommodate that and see if things improve. Hopefully the platform allows for easy customization of this.
DaveTheCoder I'm pretty sure that most people do exactly what I described; they press the insert code
button and then paste. Why not accommodate that and see if things improve. Hopefully the platform allows for easy customization of this.
xyz I'm pretty sure that most people do exactly what I described; they press the insert code button and then paste. Why not accommodate that and see if things improve. Hopefully the platform allows for easy customization of this.
Alas, much as I agree with you, this is a question to ask Flarum developers, or vanilla developers which is the forum software we had used previously. Both have opted to do it the same. I don't really know why.
And I can attest, a lot of my time moderating was taken up by just fixing the formatting of new user posts back when I was the forum janitor.
xyz This is great feedback! Let me see what I can do. I'll do some investigating.
Before, there also used to be a "how to use the forum" thread written for the previous platform. To update that or re-write it to be up to date is also on the to-do list (to be included in the onboarding thread). But to make the code formatter smart enough to recognize what to use depending on the input from the user. That would be great. If it's not supported, then perhaps creating a plugin that's capable of handling it would be something.
I'll look into it.
Megalomaniak Alas, much as I agree with you, this is a question to ask Flarum developers, or vanilla developers which is the forum software we had used previously. Both have opted to do it the same. I don't really know why.
They probably chose what looked most logical to them. But in practice the user culture and behavior may vary between communities, depending on demographics. So I think customizing/adapting to actual observed behavior is the way to go.
xyz Yeah, probably. At least in case of Vanilla I know the markdown editor was a plugin so def. customizable. I'm not familiar enough with flarum but maybe it is reasonably doable. The downside is it becomes tech debt to maintain a custom form of the plugin.
Megalomaniak Maybe the Flarum devs could be directly contacted regarding the issue.
Yeah, I'd probably give that a try before resorting to a custom fork, also trying to dig through the flarum source (only quickly tho) I didn't find a plugin for the editor, seems core. But that doesn't mean a editor replacer plugin is necessarily impossible.
IMHO, the forum should be rewritten in Godot.
DaveTheCoder That would be something, haha!
DaveTheCoder IMHO, the forum should be rewritten in Godot.
You likely jest but I wont deny the thought may have run through my mind too a couple of years ago. But then you are limiting people to browsing the forum via WebGL capable devices only. So while a cool idea I sadly don't think it's really viable. Well, yet anyways.
Now a godot plugin that would put a forum right inside of the godot editor on the other hand...
Megalomaniak Now a godot plugin that would put a forum right inside of the godot editor on the other hand...
Now we're thinking with portals!
DaveTheCoder IMHO, the forum should be rewritten in Godot.
Um… is it basically possible to make a website and forum on Godot?
Megalomaniak But then you are limiting people to browsing the forum via WebGL capable devices only.
Is that a very big limitation?
Hey, we can't fix the code formatting glitch but we can instead port the whole forum to webgl. That's the true engineering spirit right there. LOL
Tomcat Is that a very big limitation?
Lots of people browse via phones and lot of people might want to use an old laptop to browse with while using godot on their main system. Old HW can have issues with WebGL.