- Edited
DaveTheCoder That's nonsense. Just treat ChatGPT as a very knowledgeable person who sometimes provides correct information and sometimes provides incorrect information. I.e., don't trust the information without confirming it.
The irony. You just said yourself that ChatGPT is redundant; Let's not check a reliable source immediately. Let's waste time with a chatbot and then check if what it blurted out is valid at that reliable source. Yeah, totally makes sense.
ChatGPT shouldn't be treated as a "very knowledgeable person". It should be treated like what it is - a statistical linguistic token sequencer.