Stencyl is not free as in speech, so doesn't qualify for the listing. Excerpts from the EULA (personal edition):
"Licensee may not sublicense, lease, rent The Software, or any portions thereof."
"Additional Requirements: Licensee shall not remove, obscure, or alter any proprietary rights notices (including copyright and trade mark notices) which may be affixed to or contained within The Software or works created using The Software including but not limited to games displaying the Stencyl logo before the game begins. If Licensee desires to remove, obscure, or alter such notices, Licensee shall obtain permission from Licensor."
"Cannot create derivative works"
I am glad that the OP said "free as in speech" rather than "open source" in their criteria, because it means I do not have to argue about the semantics of "open source". For software to be "free as in speech" you need to be free to modify and distribute the software to anybody for any purpose. I have only looked at the personal (free) license, but I have no reason to think that the paid licenses are free as in speech, because it would make their business model ineffective.